Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
WAF / Web Application FirewallF5 Advanced WAF
StrongStrongStrongAdequate
4.4

VendorsWAF / Web Application FirewallF5 Advanced WAF

F5 Advanced WAF logo

F5 Advanced WAF

F5 Networks

Founded 1996·US·Public
4.4

Combined score

G2
4.2130
Gartner
4.6350

Security incident on recordNovember 2023 — actively exploited CVE-2023-46747 (Authentication bypass) in BIG-IP management interface; patched

Editorial verdict

F5 Advanced WAF achieves the second highest true positive detection rate in independent testing at 97.849%, backed by 7,500 plus attack signatures and a 25-year heritage of application delivery and security expertise. The flexible deployment across hardware appliance, virtual machine, cloud, and managed service makes it the most deployment-flexible WAF in the market. For organisations with existing F5 BIG-IP infrastructure, the integration with load balancing, SSL offload, and application delivery capabilities they already operate creates genuine operational efficiency.

The administration complexity is the highest in the NGFW category and the licensing model requires significant F5 expertise to navigate. Outside existing F5 infrastructure environments, the complexity cost is not justified by the capability advantage over Cloudflare or Imperva.

The verdict: F5 Advanced WAF is right for enterprises with existing F5 BIG-IP infrastructure wanting deep WAF integration with their application delivery environment. Organisations without F5 expertise should evaluate Cloudflare or Imperva.

Last reviewed: May 2026

G2

4.2130 reviews

Gartner

4.6350 reviews

PeerSpot

8.3150 reviews
Gartner MQ: Leader (Gartner WAAP MQ 2024)

WAF / Web Application Firewall assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
OWASP Top 10 coverage
5 / 5
Bot management
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Rule management
5 / 5
Performance & latency
4 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Traffic & threat analytics
4 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMAdequate
CDN & network quality
3 / 5

Strongest: OWASP Top 10 coverage

Watch out for: CDN & network quality

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

Deepest OWASP coverage — L7 DDoS, credential stuffing, and advanced injection attacks
BIG-IP hardware with ASIC acceleration — lowest latency for high-throughput environments
Most mature load balancer + WAF combination — one platform for networking and security

Watch out for

High implementation complexity — requires F5 certified engineers
Legacy architecture — cloud-native UX significantly below Cloudflare or Fastly
Expensive hardware and licensing — not accessible for SMB or mid-market

Best for

Large enterprises with existing F5 infrastructure wanting advanced WAF layered on their BIG-IP load balancer platform.

Not suitable for: Cloud-native organisations without F5 infrastructure investment — complexity and cost not justified from scratch.

Compliance coverage

Essential Eight
AU Privacy Act
SOC 2
HIPAA
NIST CSF
PCI-DSS
CMMC
GDPR
NIS2
DORA
ISO 27001
CIS Benchmarks

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

  • Legacy hardware WAF
  • ModSecurity on NGINX

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to WAF / Web Application FirewallCompare with other WAF / Web Application Firewall vendors →

Quick facts

Pricing modelper virtual edition or hardware appliance; subscription
Pricing rangeEnterprise custom; BIG-IP VE from $10,000/year
Free trialYes — 30 days
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time2-4 weeks
Complexity4 / 5
Pricing transparency2 / 5
AU presenceYes
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS, On-premises, Hybrid
OS supportHardware appliance, Virtual edition, Cloud
CloudAWS, Azure, GCP
Support24/7 Phone, Email, Dedicated CSM, Professional Services
Data residencyUS, EU, AU, Self-hosted

Company

F5 Networks

Founded 1996 · 6,000-7,000 employees · Public

HQ: US

$2.8B revenue FY2024

Certifications

FedRAMP, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS

Integrations

BIG-IP suiteSplunkNGINXTerraformServiceNowAnsible