Living Security Unify

Living Security has repositioned security awareness training as human risk management, and the genuine differentiator is analytics depth. Rather than measuring success through completion rates and phishing click percentages alone, Living Security aggregates behavioural signals from email security, endpoint protection, and identity systems into a single quantified risk score per employee, giving security leadership a metric they can present to the board with the same rigour as any other enterprise risk indicator. The immersive, narrative-driven training content, frequently compared to escape-room-style experiences, consistently earns more positive engagement feedback than traditional compliance slide decks, addressing the adoption problem that undermines many SAT programs.

The honest trade-off is scope. Raw compliance content library breadth for specific regulatory modules is narrower than KnowBe4 or Infosec IQ, and the premium positioning reflects the sophistication of the risk analytics rather than volume of content.

The verdict: Living Security is right for security leadership wanting to connect training investment directly to measurable, board-reportable human risk reduction. Organisations primarily needing broad compliance content library breadth should evaluate KnowBe4 or Infosec IQ instead.

Last reviewed: September 2026

Strongest: Behaviour change metrics

Watch out for: Compliance & localisation

Best for

Security leadership wanting to connect security awareness investment directly to measurable, quantified human risk reduction that can be reported to the board and executive stakeholders.

Not suitable for: Organisations primarily needing broad compliance training content library breadth rather than sophisticated risk analytics.