Comparisec
Submit reviewFor vendors
GRC / Risk & ComplianceAuditBoard
StrongStrongStrongStrong
4.7

VendorsGRC / Risk & ComplianceAuditBoard

AuditBoard logo

AuditBoard

AuditBoard

Founded 2014·US·PE-backed
4.7

Combined score

G2
4.7560
Gartner
4.7200

Editorial verdict

AuditBoard has built the strongest internal audit management platform in the GRC category. The 4.7 out of 5 ratings on both G2 and Gartner from a combined 570 plus reviews reflect a product that internal audit teams consistently find more useful than the audit modules bolted onto broader GRC platforms. The SOX compliance dashboard, automated working paper management, and audit committee reporting capabilities reflect a product that understands how internal audit functions actually operate rather than treating audit as a feature of a risk management platform.

The Hg Capital PE ownership and the audit-first focus mean broader enterprise risk management depth, compliance automation for engineering teams, and vendor risk management sophistication are less than OneTrust or MetricStream.

The verdict: AuditBoard is right for public companies and large enterprises where internal audit management, SOX compliance, and audit committee reporting are the primary GRC requirements. Organisations primarily wanting compliance automation should evaluate Vanta or Drata, and organisations needing comprehensive enterprise risk management should evaluate MetricStream.

Last reviewed: May 2026

G2

4.7560 reviews

Gartner

4.7200 reviews
Gartner MQ: Leader (Gartner GRC MQ 2024)

GRC / Risk & Compliance assessment

PROTECTIONStrong
Risk management
4 / 5
Policy lifecycle
4 / 5
OPERATIONSStrong
Audit & evidence workflows
5 / 5
Vendor risk management
4 / 5
ANALYTICSStrong
Compliance dashboards
5 / 5
TRUST & ECOSYSTEMStrong
Framework coverage
4 / 5

Strongest: Audit & evidence workflows

Watch out for: Framework coverage

Strengths & limitations

Strengths

Best audit management in category — internal audit teams rate AuditBoard highest on G2 and Gartner
Unified platform: risk, audit, compliance, and InfoSec in one single pane
Strong cross-assurance analytics — risk and control data shared across audit, compliance, and InfoSec

Watch out for

Pricing significantly higher than Vanta or Drata for comparable compliance features
Implementation requires dedicated admin resources — not self-service
Less automation for cloud-native compliance evidence collection than Vanta

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise organisations with active internal audit and risk teams wanting the strongest audit management alongside compliance.

Not suitable for: Organisations without internal audit teams — the audit-first design is overkill for pure compliance automation needs.

Compliance coverage

SOC 2
HIPAA
NIST CSF
PCI-DSS
GDPR
NIS2
DORA
ISO 27001
CIS Benchmarks
Essential Eight
AU Privacy Act
CMMC

Switching intelligence

Switching from

Common migration paths based on review data

Also considering

Vendors typically shortlisted alongside

← Back to GRC / Risk & ComplianceCompare with other GRC / Risk & Compliance vendors →

Quick facts

Pricing modelper user/year; module licensing
Pricing range$30,000-300,000+/year
Free trialNo
Min seatsNo minimum
Deployment time2-4 weeks
Complexity2 / 5
Pricing transparency2 / 5
AU presenceNo
IRAP assessedNo
Open sourceProprietary

Deployment

ModelsSaaS
OS supportCloud-native
CloudAWS
SupportPhone, Email, Dedicated CSM, Professional Services
Data residencyUS, EU

Company

AuditBoard

Founded 2014 · 700-900 employees · PE-backed

HQ: US

$200M+ ARR est.

Certifications

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

Integrations

JiraServiceNowWorkdaySAPOracleSplunkMicrosoft 365OktaSalesforce